Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How SCIOPOLIS LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSCIOPOLIS LTD(You)WSP UK LimitedOVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITEDove arup limitedSPaTS Atkins and CH2M Joint VentureHealth Integration Partners
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | WU WSP UK Limited Peer · rank #1 | OA OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | OA ove arup limited Peer · rank #3 | SA SPaTS Atkins and CH2M Joint Venture Peer · rank #4 | HI Health Integration Partners Peer · rank #5 | SC SCIOPOLIS LTD (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £88.0m | £79.3m | £11.9m | £879k | £91k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £731k | £1.9m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.1bn | £536.1m | £24.3m | £15.3m | £11.3m | £80k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 163 | 121 | 25 | 2 | 1 | 1(−96%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —