Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ForgeFront stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortForgeFront(You)AECOM LIMITEDNaibUniversity of York - Research GrantsRothamsted ResearchSUSTENIC LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | NA Naib Peer · rank #2 | FO ForgeFront (You) · target supplier | UO University of York - Research Grants Peer · rank #4 | RR Rothamsted Research Peer · rank #5 | SU SUSTENIC LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £219.6m | £226k | £79k(−100%) | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | £266k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £827.8m | £12.2m | £510k(−91%) | £3.7m | £5.6m | £2.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 133 | 5 | 1(−99%) | — | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —