Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Carter Gregson Gray stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCarter Gregson Gray(You)AECOM LIMITEDMOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITEDPURCELL ARCHITECTURE LIMITEDOVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITEDAtkinsRéalis Limited
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MA MOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | PA PURCELL ARCHITECTURE LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | OA OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | AT AtkinsRéalis Limited Peer · rank #5 | CG Carter Gregson Gray (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.4m | £58.3m | £25.0m | £688k | £132k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | £22k | — | £3.2m | £3.2m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £834.6m | £1.5bn | £35.3m | £13.2m | £46.2m | £2.1m(−96%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 142 | 75 | 10 | 11 | 4 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —