Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Mix&Vend stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 10 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMix&Vend(You)MELLORS CATERING SERVICES LIMITEDThomas Ridley Foodservice LtdSport and Leisure ManagementBFS GROUP LIMITEDSearcys
iAuto-picked from 10 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MC MELLORS CATERING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | TR Thomas Ridley Foodservice Ltd Peer · rank #2 | MI Mix&Vend (You) · target supplier | SA Sport and Leisure Management Peer · rank #4 | BG BFS GROUP LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | SE Searcys Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £11.1m | £120k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | £827.1m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £119.6m | £45.1m | £7.1m(−94%) | £379.1m | £894.3m | £11.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 8 | 2 | — | — | 5 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —