Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Clean4Shaw Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortClean4Shaw Ltd(You)Iss Mediclean LimitedKGB CLEANING SOUTH WEST LIMITEDCHURCHILL CONTRACT SERVICES LIMITEDN-VIRO LIMITEDKGB Southwest Ltd
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | IM Iss Mediclean Limited Peer · rank #1 | KC KGB CLEANING SOUTH WEST LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | CC CHURCHILL CONTRACT SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | CL Clean4Shaw Ltd (You) · target supplier | N- N-VIRO LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | KS KGB Southwest Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £286.4m | £12.8m | £8.2m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £6.3m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.6bn | £51.5m | £254.8m | £278k(−100%) | £61.0m | £18.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | 9 | 15 | — | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —