Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Hunters and Partners Ltd. stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortHunters and Partners Ltd.(You)AECOM LIMITEDMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdAIRBORNE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LIMITEDCityAxis Limited
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #3 | AE AIRBORNE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | HA Hunters and Partners Ltd. (You) · target supplier | CI CityAxis Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £221.1m | £59.0m | £41.7m | £600k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | £22k | — | £32k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £827.0m | £1.5bn | £522.0m | £32.3m | £3.2m(−99%) | £71.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 137 | 79 | 23 | 3 | — | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —