Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How NO AWARDS HAVE BEEN MADE ON THIS TENDER stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNO AWARDS HAVE BEEN MADE ON THIS TENDER(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCCGI IT UK LIMITEDLOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITEDInfluential Software ServicesPlaces for People Leisure
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | LP LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | IS Influential Software Services Peer · rank #4 | NA NO AWARDS HAVE BEEN MADE ON THIS TENDER (You) · target supplier | PF Places for People Leisure Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £772.3m | £528.7m | £174.0m | £30.1m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.7m | £17.3m | £1.0m | — | — | £235.3m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.5bn | £2.2bn | £1.3bn | £33.3m | £26.6m(−98%) | £235.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 46 | 34 | 9 | 3 | — | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —