Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How TOTAL LIFT CARE stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTOTAL LIFT CARE(You)Constellia Public LimitedMORRIS VERMAPORT LIMITEDStiltz LimitedRJ Lifts GroupJACKSON LIFT SERVICES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CP Constellia Public Limited Peer · rank #1 | MV MORRIS VERMAPORT LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | ST Stiltz Limited Peer · rank #3 | RL RJ Lifts Group Peer · rank #4 | JL JACKSON LIFT SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | TL TOTAL LIFT CARE (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £31.9m | £8.9m | £1.5m | £1.0m | £314k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £275k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £605.7m | £20.1m | £2.1m | £8.4m | £37.0m | £626k(−97%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 132 | 17 | 3 | 12 | 10 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —