Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How SISK Healthcare t/a M.E.D. Surgical stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSISK Healthcare t/a M.E.D. Surgical(You)MEDTRONIC LIMITEDMedequip Assistive Technology LtdOLYMPUS KEYMED GROUP LIMITEDBECKMAN COULTER UNITED KINGDOM LIMITEDPROMEGA UK LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | ME MEDTRONIC LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MA Medequip Assistive Technology Ltd Peer · rank #2 | OK OLYMPUS KEYMED GROUP LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | BC BECKMAN COULTER UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | SH SISK Healthcare t/a M.E.D. Surgical (You) · target supplier | PU PROMEGA UK LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £27.5m | £8.5m | £5.9m | £941k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £327k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £460.8m | £822.4m | £54.6m | £204.9m | — | £65.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 31 | 6 | 20 | 7 | — | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —