Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Clancy Construction Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortClancy Construction Ltd(You)AECOM LIMITEDMace Consult LimitedKier Integrated ServicesFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITEDPennington Choices Limited
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #2 | KI Kier Integrated Services Peer · rank #3 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | PC Pennington Choices Limited Peer · rank #5 | CC Clancy Construction Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.8m | £71.1m | £16.1m | £10.4m | £7.9m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £834.6m | £738.8m | £1.7bn | £247.2m | £183.6m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 144 | 17 | 8 | 17 | 20 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —