Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Esh Construction Limited (Appointed to Lots 1 & 2) stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 11 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortEsh Construction Limited (Appointed to Lots 1 & 2)(You)Wates Construction LimitedIan WilliamsMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDLIVGREEN FUTURES LIMITEDMONKS SECURITY SYSTEMS LTD
iAuto-picked from 11 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | WC Wates Construction Limited Peer · rank #1 | IW Ian Williams Peer · rank #2 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | LF LIVGREEN FUTURES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | EC Esh Construction Limited (Appointed to Lots 1 & 2) (You) · target supplier | MS MONKS SECURITY SYSTEMS LTD Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £251.9m | £235.2m | £59.0m | £31.4m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £32.8m | £231k | £22k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £7.1bn | £1.0bn | £1.5bn | £94.2m | — | £15.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 20 | 22 | 75 | 4 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —