Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Bruker Spatial Biology stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortBruker Spatial Biology(You)EFT SYSTEMS LIMITEDMORGAN LAMBERT LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | ES EFT SYSTEMS LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | ML MORGAN LAMBERT LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | BS Bruker Spatial Biology (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | |||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £2.8m | £2.4m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £98.9m | £151.3m | £7k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | 9 | 1(−83%) |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 58 | 73 | 3(−95%) |
| Unique public buyersDistinct buying authorities | 24 | 43 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —