Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How NTA Monitor Limited t/a Intertek NTA stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNTA Monitor Limited t/a Intertek NTA(You)Deloitte LLPOracle Corporation UK LimitedTrustmarque Solutions LtdAtamis LtdFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #1 | OC Oracle Corporation UK Limited Peer · rank #2 | TS Trustmarque Solutions Ltd Peer · rank #3 | AT Atamis Ltd Peer · rank #4 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | NM NTA Monitor Limited t/a Intertek NTA (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £418.7m | £161.2m | £83.8m | £19.6m | £10.4m | £47k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £12.0m | £2.5m | — | £18.1m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.8bn | £1.0bn | £83.8m | £74.2m | £247.2m | £263k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 89 | 73 | 5 | 13 | 19 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —