Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How IDNS Ltd. stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortIDNS Ltd.(You)SoftcatFujitsu Services LimitedCDW UK LtdBoxxe LimitedCENTERPRISE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | FS Fujitsu Services Limited Peer · rank #2 | CU CDW UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | BO Boxxe Limited Peer · rank #4 | CI CENTERPRISE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | ID IDNS Ltd. (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £450.8m | £286.8m | £202.2m | £53.0m | £23.6m | £94k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48.3m | — | £123k | £2.5m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £2.8bn | £1.3bn | £1.1bn | £248.6m | £2.2m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 474 | 7 | 126 | 77 | 22 | 3 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —