Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Caremark Liverpool stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCaremark Liverpool(You)Blackhawk Network EMEA LtdVCARE-24 LIMITEDSomerset CouncilSt BasilsMersey Care NHS Foundation Trust
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BN Blackhawk Network EMEA Ltd Peer · rank #1 | VC VCARE-24 LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | SC Somerset Council Peer · rank #3 | SB St Basils Peer · rank #4 | CL Caremark Liverpool (You) · target supplier | MC Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £9.5m | £817k | £727k | £474k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £75.0m | £817k | £1.4m | £21.2m | — | £51.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | — | 3 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —