Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Emarsys stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortEmarsys(You)CGI IT UK LIMITEDSoftcatPhoenix Software LimitedBoxxe LimitedMicrosoft Ireland
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SO Softcat Peer · rank #2 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #3 | BO Boxxe Limited Peer · rank #4 | EM Emarsys (You) · target supplier | MI Microsoft Ireland Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £516.5m | £443.8m | £294.1m | £53.5m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £17.3m | £48.3m | £471k | £2.5m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.9bn | £1.6bn | £3.7bn | £1.1bn | £200k(−100%) | £3.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 31 | 463 | 220 | 79 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —