Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How List of successful awarded suppliers available under Attachments stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortList of successful awarded suppliers available under Attachments(You)Kier ConstructionORACLE CORPORATION UK LTDWALTER LILLY & CO. LIMITEDManchester & Cheshire Construction Co. LimitedUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | OC ORACLE CORPORATION UK LTD Peer · rank #2 | WL WALTER LILLY & CO. LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | M& Manchester & Cheshire Construction Co. Limited Peer · rank #4 | UH UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST Peer · rank #5 | LO List of successful awarded suppliers available under Attachments (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £11.3m | £8.2m | £5.3m | £3.5m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.5bn | £11.3m | £60.9m | £45.3m | £442.0m | £86.2bn(+141405%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 35 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —