Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MM Miller stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMM Miller(You)ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDHenry Boot Construction LimitedMatthews and TannertBreheny Civil EngineeringCOLEMAN & COMPANY LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EC ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | HB Henry Boot Construction Limited Peer · rank #2 | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #3 | BC Breheny Civil Engineering Peer · rank #4 | MM MM Miller (You) · target supplier | C& COLEMAN & COMPANY LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £83.7m | £22.7m | £7.1m | £6.1m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.0m | — | £631k | £95k | — | £32k |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £775.5m | £207.7m | £246.5m | — | £86.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 27 | 4 | 10 | 29 | — | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —