Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How SPRING TECHNOLOGY stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSPRING TECHNOLOGY(You)Alexander Mann SolutionsSoftcatCOMENSURA LIMITEDCrayon LimitedReed Specialist Recrutiment
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AM Alexander Mann Solutions Peer · rank #1 | SO Softcat Peer · rank #2 | CO COMENSURA LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | CR Crayon Limited Peer · rank #4 | RS Reed Specialist Recrutiment Peer · rank #5 | ST SPRING TECHNOLOGY (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £3.6bn | £443.8m | £175.1m | £602k | £161k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £15.1m | £48.3m | £108.0m | — | £43k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £24.4bn | £1.6bn | £3.0bn | £141.5m | £36.4m | £24.7m(−98%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 33 | 463 | 9 | 1 | 5 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —