Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How minicabs stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
Cohortminicabs(You)Apec GroupViaVanCMAC Group UK LtdABC SupremeSumit Kumra / Premier Taxis,skyline taxi
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AG Apec Group Peer · rank #1 | MI minicabs (You) · target supplier | VI ViaVan Peer · rank #3 | CG CMAC Group UK Ltd Peer · rank #4 | AS ABC Supreme Peer · rank #5 | SK Sumit Kumra / Premier Taxis,skyline taxi Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.1m | £85k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £16.7m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.1m | £526k(−90%) | £5.5m | £25.1m | £5.4m | £900k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 12 | 5(−23%) | — | 1 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —