Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Nottingham City Council stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNottingham City Council(You)KPMG LLPASPENS-SERVICES LIMITEDRECONOMY (UK) LIMITEDTHE GROWTH COMPANY LIMITEDAlternative Heat Ltd
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | AS ASPENS-SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | R( RECONOMY (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | TG THE GROWTH COMPANY LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | NC Nottingham City Council (You) · target supplier | AH Alternative Heat Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £324.0m | £8.3m | £300k | £91k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £8.3m | £12.5m | £456.4m | £36.1m(−79%) | £168.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 1(−50%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —