Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How PCC For Hampshire stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPCC For Hampshire(You)SoftcatPhoenix Software LimitedACCENTURE (UK) LIMITEDAccess UK LimitedCOGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS GLOBAL SERVICES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #2 | A( ACCENTURE (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | AU Access UK Limited Peer · rank #4 | PF PCC For Hampshire (You) · target supplier | CT COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS GLOBAL SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £443.8m | £293.8m | £291.0m | £25.7m | £36k(−100%) | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48.3m | £471k | £703k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £3.7bn | £5.4bn | £151.2m | £36k(−100%) | £208.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 463 | 219 | 24 | 43 | 1(−99%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —