Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Mola Museum of London stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMola Museum of London(You)Perfect Circle JV LtdSTRUCTURAL SOILS LIMITEDFrankham Consultancy Group LimitedENVIRONTEC LIMITEDMITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC Perfect Circle JV Ltd Peer · rank #1 | SS STRUCTURAL SOILS LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | FC Frankham Consultancy Group Limited Peer · rank #3 | EN ENVIRONTEC LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | MW MITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | MM Mola Museum of London (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £39.3m | £10.7m | £7.1m | £4.6m | £2.0m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | — | — | £32k | £121.0m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.3bn | £23.8m | £101.9m | £140.5m | £187.3m | £1.7m(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 15 | 1 | 7 | 14 | 4 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —