Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How SMITH DESIGN AGENCY stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSMITH DESIGN AGENCY(You)APS GroupKaye And Co.Marcon Fit-Out LtdMcCaddenAGENCE IF
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AG APS Group Peer · rank #1 | KA Kaye And Co. Peer · rank #2 | SD SMITH DESIGN AGENCY (You) · target supplier | MF Marcon Fit-Out Ltd Peer · rank #4 | MC McCadden Peer · rank #5 | AI AGENCE IF Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £600k | £180k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £36.1m | £330k | — | £5.5m | £480k | £615k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —