Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Greenwood Plants stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGreenwood Plants(You)Place ServicesGroundsGardens and Trees LTDThe GrowerAmethyst Horticulture Ltd
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PS Place Services Peer · rank #1 | GR Grounds Peer · rank #2 | GA Gardens and Trees LTD Peer · rank #3 | GP Greenwood Plants (You) · target supplier | TG The Grower Peer · rank #5 | AH Amethyst Horticulture Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £130k | £83k | £83k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.1m | £1.0m | £193k | £2.7m(+160%) | £331k | £1.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 1 | 1 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —