Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Turner EPS/Mitchell Power Systems stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTurner EPS/Mitchell Power Systems(You)Wates Construction LimitedP & I GENERATORS LIMITEDDale Power Solutions PLCPlayfords LimitedAggreko UK Limited
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | WC Wates Construction Limited Peer · rank #1 | P& P & I GENERATORS LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | DP Dale Power Solutions PLC Peer · rank #3 | TE Turner EPS/Mitchell Power Systems (You) · target supplier | PL Playfords Limited Peer · rank #5 | AU Aggreko UK Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £251.9m | £1.0m | £44k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £32.8m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £7.1bn | £1.7m | £10.4m | £140k(−99%) | £24.8m | £15.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 20 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —