Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Subcan UDS Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSubcan UDS Ltd(You)HAYSTOUN CONSTRUCTION LTD.Parade Civil Engineering LimitedWalter Thompson (Contractors) LtdARM Pipetek LtdAMT Projects Construction Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | HC HAYSTOUN CONSTRUCTION LTD. Peer · rank #1 | PC Parade Civil Engineering Limited Peer · rank #2 | SU Subcan UDS Ltd (You) · target supplier | WT Walter Thompson (Contractors) Ltd Peer · rank #4 | AP ARM Pipetek Ltd Peer · rank #5 | AP AMT Projects Construction Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.1m | £223k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £313k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £17.1m | £5.6m | £25.0m(+127%) | £48.7m | £11.0m | £4.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 15 | 3 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —