Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How BCI Ramallah stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortBCI Ramallah(You)CDW UK LtdXMA LtdCENTERPRISE INTERNATIONAL LIMITEDFortrus LtdBT
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CDW UK Ltd Peer · rank #1 | XM XMA Ltd Peer · rank #2 | CI CENTERPRISE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | FO Fortrus Ltd Peer · rank #4 | BT BT Peer · rank #5 | BR BCI Ramallah (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £204.1m | £37.4m | £23.6m | £5.7m | £1.4m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £123k | £945k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.3bn | £1.0bn | £248.6m | £20.1bn | £732.8m | £17k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 128 | 71 | 22 | 2 | 4 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —