Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Osbourne Richardson Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortOsbourne Richardson Limited(You)RSK Environment LtdSuez Recycling and Recovery UK LtdJeremy Benn Associates LimitedThomas Ridley Foodservice LtdFCC WASTE SERVICES (UK) LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | RE RSK Environment Ltd Peer · rank #1 | SR Suez Recycling and Recovery UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | JB Jeremy Benn Associates Limited Peer · rank #3 | TR Thomas Ridley Foodservice Ltd Peer · rank #4 | OR Osbourne Richardson Limited (You) · target supplier | FW FCC WASTE SERVICES (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £5.2m | £1.8m | £915k | £120k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £89k | — | — | — | £28.1m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £93.4m | £802.9m | £32.9m | £45.1m | £211k(−100%) | £111.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 16 | 24 | 17 | 1 | — | 4 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —