Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Inline.Marketing stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortInline.Marketing(You)Citysprint (Uk) LimitedTOPSPEED COURIERS LIMITEDTVS Supply Chain Solutions LimitedSharp Clinical Services UK Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | C( Citysprint (Uk) Limited Peer · rank #1 | TC TOPSPEED COURIERS LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | TS TVS Supply Chain Solutions Limited Peer · rank #3 | IN Inline.Marketing (You) · target supplier | SC Sharp Clinical Services UK Ltd Peer · rank #5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | |||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.0m | £3.6m | £166k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £52.0m | £83.8m | £166.4m | £800k(−99%) | £37.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 80 | ||||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —