Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MiQuill stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMiQuill(You)Cater Link LimitedOlive Dining LtdOlive Dining Limited - (awarded TetherdownLea Valley & TheAccent Catering Services Limited (awarded Rhodes Avenue)
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CL Cater Link Limited Peer · rank #1 | OD Olive Dining Ltd Peer · rank #2 | MI MiQuill (You) · target supplier | OD Olive Dining Limited - (awarded Tetherdown Peer · rank #4 | LV Lea Valley & The Peer · rank #5 | AC Accent Catering Services Limited (awarded Rhodes Avenue) Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £23.6m | £5.6m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £297.0m | £91.7m | — | £667k | £667k | £667k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 11 | 6 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —