Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Ridley Recycling Ltd t/a Peter Ridley Waste Systems stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 17 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortRidley Recycling Ltd t/a Peter Ridley Waste Systems(You)CAUSEWAY TECHNOLOGIES LIMITEDIPL PLASTICS (UK) LIMITEDRECONOMY (UK) LIMITEDSmurfit Kappa RecyclingH W MARTIN WASTE LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 17 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CT CAUSEWAY TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | IP IPL PLASTICS (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | R( RECONOMY (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | RR Ridley Recycling Ltd t/a Peter Ridley Waste Systems (You) · target supplier | SK Smurfit Kappa Recycling Peer · rank #5 | HW H W MARTIN WASTE LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £15.1m | £5.3m | £300k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £603k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £30.3m | £82.8m | £12.5m | £47.2m(+56%) | £24.4m | £133.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 20 | 20 | 2 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —