Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How chris burnett associates stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
Cohortchris burnett associates(You)Arcus Consulting LLP CPC Project Services LLPBaily GarnerBDPWT Partnership
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AC Arcus Consulting LLP Peer · rank #1 | CP CPC Project Services LLP Peer · rank #2 | BG Baily Garner Peer · rank #3 | BD BDP Peer · rank #4 | CB chris burnett associates (You) · target supplier | WP WT Partnership Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £3.8m | £3.5m | £2.1m | £192k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £121k | £53k | £53k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £216.4m | £139.2m | £138.1m | £294.2m | £29k(−100%) | £69.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 14 | 13 | 12 | 4 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —