Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Gibbs and son stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGibbs and son(You)Blakedown Landscapes (SE) LtdBakers of Danbury LtdI Am Gardening Services LimitedCormacGreen Petals Landscape Services
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BL Blakedown Landscapes (SE) Ltd Peer · rank #1 | BO Bakers of Danbury Ltd Peer · rank #2 | IA I Am Gardening Services Limited Peer · rank #3 | CO Cormac Peer · rank #4 | GA Gibbs and son (You) · target supplier | GP Green Petals Landscape Services Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3m | £565k | £480k | £428k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £199k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £37.5m | £5.0m | £480k | £36.1m | £528k(−89%) | £417k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | 1 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —