Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust(You)KPMG LLPMOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITEDOVIVA UK LIMITED(2) Optima Health UK LimitedPulse Healthcare Limited t/a Xyla
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | MA MOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | OU OVIVA UK LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | (O (2) Optima Health UK Limited Peer · rank #4 | PH Pulse Healthcare Limited t/a Xyla Peer · rank #5 | RM Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £315.4m | £59.1m | £3.7m | £2.5m | £2.0m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £40.1m | £22k | £247k | — | £385k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £1.5bn | £16.4m | £2.5m | £823.1m | £17.0m(−98%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 94 | 83 | 15 | 1 | 10 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —