Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Pension Policy Institute stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPension Policy Institute(You)KPMG LLPPhoenix Software LimitedSpecialist computer centresi10 LimitedRefer to the attachments area
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #2 | SC Specialist computer centres Peer · rank #3 | I1 i10 Limited Peer · rank #4 | PP Pension Policy Institute (You) · target supplier | RT Refer to the attachments area Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £324.0m | £293.8m | £130.0m | £60.2m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | £471k | £2.3m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £3.7bn | £1.0bn | £89.7m | £53k(−100%) | £2.0bn |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 219 | 114 | 1 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —