Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Lisa’s ChildcAyr stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortLisa’s ChildcAyr(You)National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to ChildrenThe Toddler House LtdKANGAROO POUCH LIMITEDCognition EducationMIND Havering
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | NS | LC Lisa’s ChildcAyr (You) · target supplier | TT The Toddler House Ltd Peer · rank #3 | KP KANGAROO POUCH LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | CE Cognition Education Peer · rank #5 | MH MIND Havering Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £48k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £48k | — | £286k | £198k | £10.5m | £23k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | — | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —