Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Mercy Corps stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMercy Corps(You)Siren Associates LimitedMedequip Assistive Technology LtdAdam Smith International LtdPALLADIUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITEDDT GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT UK LTD
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SA Siren Associates Limited Peer · rank #1 | MA Medequip Assistive Technology Ltd Peer · rank #2 | AS Adam Smith International Ltd Peer · rank #3 | MC Mercy Corps (You) · target supplier | PI PALLADIUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | DG DT GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT UK LTD Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £46.4m | £8.5m | £2.3m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | £75.0m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £77.7m | £822.4m | £786.9m | — | £1.7bn | £52.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 6 | 1 | — | 8 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —