Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Lambert Smith-Hampton stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortLambert Smith-Hampton(You)PICK EVERARDPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPEon UK Green Funding Solutions LimitedArcadis UK LLPMITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PE PICK EVERARD Peer · rank #1 | PR PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Peer · rank #2 | EU Eon UK Green Funding Solutions Limited Peer · rank #3 | AU Arcadis UK LLP Peer · rank #4 | MW MITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | LS Lambert Smith-Hampton (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £2.1bn | £52.1m | £35.9m | £17.3m | £2.0m | £155k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | £121.0m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.2bn | £266.2m | £76.5m | £174.6m | £187.3m | £44.8m(−76%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 23 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 4 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —