Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Rodgers Leask Limited acting as lead contact for consortium bid stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortRodgers Leask Limited acting as lead contact for consortium bid(You)AECOM LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdEDF ENERGYPellings LLPSSCL
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #2 | EE EDF ENERGY Peer · rank #3 | PE Pellings LLP Peer · rank #4 | RL Rodgers Leask Limited acting as lead contact for consortium bid (You) · target supplier | SS SSCL Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £221.1m | £41.7m | £32.5m | £1.5m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | — | £1.4m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £827.0m | £522.0m | £763.1m | £148.4m | £25.9m(−95%) | £159.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 137 | 23 | 10 | 4 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —