Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How WH Scott & Son Engineers Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 9 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortWH Scott & Son Engineers Ltd(You)Amalgamated Construction LtdMAHLE POWERTRAIN LIMITEDSCIENTIFIC LABORATORY SUPPLIES LIMITEDDALKIA FACILITIES LIMITEDHewer FM Ltd
iAuto-picked from 9 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AC Amalgamated Construction Ltd Peer · rank #1 | MP MAHLE POWERTRAIN LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | SL SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY SUPPLIES LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | DF DALKIA FACILITIES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | WS WH Scott & Son Engineers Ltd (You) · target supplier | HF Hewer FM Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £3.7m | £477k | £167k | £80k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £98.6m | £5.4m | £107.2m | £9.7m | £721k(−93%) | £2.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 11 | 3 | 9 | 4 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —