Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Conserv stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortConserv(You)Royal Society of Wildlife TrustNATIONAL TRUSTCheckit Europe LimitedNielsenIQMM Enviro ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | RS Royal Society of Wildlife Trust Peer · rank #1 | NT NATIONAL TRUST Peer · rank #2 | CE Checkit Europe Limited Peer · rank #3 | CO Conserv (You) · target supplier | NI NielsenIQ Peer · rank #5 | ME MM Enviro ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £817k | £699k | £29k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £939k | £1.3m | £1.2m | — | £1.8m | £1.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 6 | 3 | 1 | — | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —