Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Refer to the attachments area stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 19 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortRefer to the attachments area(You)Phoenix Software LimitedSpecialist computer centresEDF ENERGYBP Oil International Limited EKO Cyprus Ltd
iAuto-picked from 19 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #1 | SC Specialist computer centres Peer · rank #2 | EE EDF ENERGY Peer · rank #3 | BO BP Oil International Limited Peer · rank #4 | RT Refer to the attachments area (You) · target supplier | EC EKO Cyprus Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £281.6m | £130.4m | £32.5m | £26.5m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £471k | £2.3m | £1.4m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.7bn | £1.0bn | £763.1m | £513.7m | £2.0bn(+162%) | £17.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 219 | 116 | 10 | 1 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —