Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Plymouth University stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 12 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPlymouth University(You)University of WarwickNaibUniversity of York - Research GrantsRothamsted ResearchSUSTENIC LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 12 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | UO University of Warwick Peer · rank #1 | NA Naib Peer · rank #2 | PU Plymouth University (You) · target supplier | UO University of York - Research Grants Peer · rank #4 | RR Rothamsted Research Peer · rank #5 | SU SUSTENIC LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £537k | £226k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £266k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £20.7m | £12.2m | £95k(−98%) | £3.7m | £5.6m | £2.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 5 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —