Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Etec Group stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortEtec Group(You)Matthews and TannertPilon LimitedMuse Developments LtdMulalley and Company LtdNationwide Windows UK Ltd
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #1 | PI Pilon Limited Peer · rank #2 | EG Etec Group (You) · target supplier | MD Muse Developments Ltd Peer · rank #4 | MA Mulalley and Company Ltd Peer · rank #5 | NW Nationwide Windows UK Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £6.7m | £6.7m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £631k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £207.7m | £280.3m | £5.3m(−98%) | £3.0bn | £254.0m | £17.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | 4 | 1(−85%) | — | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —