Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Shire X Logging stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortShire X Logging(You)Thompson Tree Services Ltdidverde LimitedTreehab LimitedConnick Tree Services LtdNationcare Windows Ltd
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TT Thompson Tree Services Ltd Peer · rank #1 | ID idverde Limited Peer · rank #2 | SX Shire X Logging (You) · target supplier | TR Treehab Limited Peer · rank #4 | CT Connick Tree Services Ltd Peer · rank #5 | NW Nationcare Windows Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.1m | £1.0m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £32.5m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.1m | £494.4m | — | £4.8m | £9.1m | £13.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —