Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How The Stone and Garden Company Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortThe Stone and Garden Company Limited(You)ICL UK (SALES) LIMITEDSIEMENS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | IU ICL UK (SALES) LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SP SIEMENS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY Peer · rank #2 | TS The Stone and Garden Company Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | |||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £581k | £39k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £100k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £139.5m | £93.5m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 8 | 4 | — |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 40 | 90 | 1(−98%) |
| Unique public buyersDistinct buying authorities | 15 | 33 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —