Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How QI Van Systems stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortQI Van Systems(You)TGS (UK) LTDMackworth Vehicle Conversion Specialist C/o Imperial CommercialsGentili UK LtdSortimo International LimitedBri-Stor
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | T( TGS (UK) LTD Peer · rank #1 | QV QI Van Systems (You) · target supplier | MV | GU Gentili UK Ltd Peer · rank #4 | SI Sortimo International Limited Peer · rank #5 | BR Bri-Stor Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £241k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £66k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £20.2m | £1.2m(+19%) | £1.0m | £300k | £21.2m | £104k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | — | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —