Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Exmoor National Park Authority stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortExmoor National Park Authority(You)IBM United Kingdom LimitedJacobs UK LtdMade Tech LimitedJACOBS U.K. LIMITED9th wave consulting Ltd
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | IU IBM United Kingdom Limited Peer · rank #1 | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | MT Made Tech Limited Peer · rank #3 | JU JACOBS U.K. LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | 9W 9th wave consulting Ltd Peer · rank #5 | EN Exmoor National Park Authority (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £469.6m | £47.9m | £41.5m | £27.6m | £8.4m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £357.6m | £264k | — | £694k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.6bn | £1.4bn | £225.0m | £545.7m | £8.4m | £30k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 35 | 79 | 5 | 29 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —