Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Mills and Reeve LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 11 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMills and Reeve LLP(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCKPMG LLPQUANTEXA LIMITEDPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPEversheds Sutherland (International) LLP
iAuto-picked from 11 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #2 | QU QUANTEXA LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | PR PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Peer · rank #4 | ES Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP Peer · rank #5 | MA Mills and Reeve LLP (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £642.6m | £324.0m | £175.0m | £52.1m | £20.8m | £80k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | £44.5m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £4.7bn | £186.4m | £266.2m | £154.5m | £9.3m(−96%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 39 | 97 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —